Lead With Alignment

Lead With Alignment

Skipping Bloom Is Dorian Gray in Academic Drag

Against Frictionless Pedagogy

Christine Haskell, Ph.D.'s avatar
Christine Haskell, Ph.D.
Oct 22, 2025
∙ Paid
2
2
Share

At a recent conference, a panelist praised AI for helping students bypass foundational steps in Bloom’s taxonomy and ‘get more done,’ questioning whether group dynamics were worth the effort.

The room didn’t nod; it shifted. People pictured first-years without the domain footing to interrogate an output, accepting it because it looked cleaner than anything they could have drafted. The irony is that this was the point of the class: to interrupt the reflex for task over maintenance, to notice and name the slow work that builds judgment. Maintenance is where norms are negotiated, roles clarified, trust earned; it’s where the frictions of shared purpose are metabolized into judgment. Task without maintenance is choreography without rehearsal—crisp at 9 a.m., brittle by afternoon.

The irony is that the point of the class was to correct a reflex for task over maintenance, to notice and name the slow work that builds judgment. Visioning isn’t a sharp-sounding listicle destined for lamination; it’s a social process—collaboration, roles, norms, the choreography of disagreement. Instead, the session slid into execution dressed as leadership. The instructor’s enthusiasm did the rest, recoding gloss as progress. At the same time, what was skipped wasn’t “busy work” but the accretion of concepts and the argumentative scuffle that turns private hunch into shared understanding, the friction that forges judgment.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Lead With Alignment to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Christine Haskell
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture